Be part of this exciting exchange: MSearchGroove welcomes guest essays and commentary. Please contact me at peggy@msearchgroove.com.
Despite a few false starts over the last seven years, it looks like mobile media might finally happen-proving the cynics wrong. So now the question becomes: where will the mobile media profits be?
To date, there have been many more disappointments than successes. While I couldn’t even count the number of billion-dollar businesses spawned off the Internet, I can’t think of a single one in the mobile media industry.
Few venture capitalists can claim to have made money on a mobile media company. Jamba was the only European mobile media company that enjoyed a substantial exit when acquired by Verisign for $273 million in 2004 , but its business model suffered from a severe backlash against subscription services directly following the acquisition. In the United States, m-qube was sold for $250 million also to Verisign in 2006, but there again, the long-term value of that business is questionable: Verisign has recently announced that it is refocusing on its core Internet business and divesting its other businesses, presumably including messaging .
Musiwave’s $120 million exit to Openwave wasn’t good news either: Openwave recently announced a $70 million write-down and sale of Musiwave to Microsoft for $46 million . The one and only exception, of course, is Jamdat, which went public in 2004 at a valuation of $16/share, valuing the company at $312 million, and was sold a year later to EA for $680 million.
The outlook isn’t great in the public markets either. There’s Itouch-which went public in the summer of 2000 at a valuation of GBP 200 million and was sold to For-side five years later for GBP 181 million. In the UK, the large majority of mobile value-added services companies that went public between 2003 and 2006 on the AIM market are now trading at significant discounts to their IPO price. While there haven’t been as many IPOs on Nasdaq, Glu Mobile went public at about $12/share in March this year, and is now trading at less than $5 on the back of lower than expected quarterly revenues.
The reasons for the paucity of successes in mobile media are well known and mostly related to the structure of the industry: Carrier control over billing and distribution, closed operating systems, multiplicity and complexity of developer platforms and handsets, and the absence of flat-rate data packages, to name a few.
The good news? Most of these restrictions are gradually being stripped away. Carrier control over billing and distribution is weakening in most of the world, and there is a clear trend toward off-portal distribution. Flat-rate data packages are mushrooming, though have yet to enjoy significant traction. Google’s release of Android has focused the industry on the potential for an open mobile OS that could quickly become a standard.
So this naturally brings us back to our original question: where are the mobile media profits?
- Posted in
- Mobile Social Networking, Web 2.0, Mobile Search, Mobile Music, Mobile Advertising, Mobile Content, Content Discovery












I caught up with Ted Morgan, Skyhook Wireless CEO, to get an update on Loki and the inside track on the company’s future roadmap. Skyhook, which has been mapping Wi-Fi networks in all of America’s most densely populated areas and is now expanding to Europe, has created a reference point that can help location-based applications orient themselves when GPS won’t work.Ted told me mobile content companies and mobile search companies are lining up now that they “get” the value of this approach. To date, he’s in discussions with all the usual suspects. Predictably, brands and advertisers are just beginning to get their head around contextual advertising, but the scenarios are nonetheless exciting.