Kudos to Mark Hawkins and the team over at the Mobile Data Association

On the face of it, the partnership between BBC Radio 1 and all the major U.K. mobile operators is aimed at allowing listeners in the U.K. to send the radio station picture messages (MMS) from their mobile phones for the first-time ever all day today (December 11) free of charge. But dig a bit deeper and the event has been set up as a springboard to encourage people to use their phones to do more.

To this end the MDA has also launched an educational website with the long-term aim of helping people to send picture messages: http://www.getsettings.org. The idea is to provide people a “single, unified hub of settings information” and address configuration issues around older handsets in circulation and SIM-only contracts.”

Of course, this problem isn’t limited to the U.K. and I hope this educational effort sets a precedent other professional organizations and mobile companies follow.

NIGHTMARE AHEAD

In fact, the job of solving the myriad of issues around customer education to make using our phones and accessing the mobile Internet a no-brainer is widely considered to be the chief business imperative of the coming year.

This is the view that came across loud and clear at MIDAS: Managing Innovative Devices and Services, an industry event I attended and spoke at last year (organized by my esteemed colleague Abraham Joseph, Founder, Device Management Forum).

During the event we discussed the advance of the mobile Internet and what the impact would be on stakeholders (device makers, mobile operators and software vendors, distributors and retailers) when we all need assistance to surf the Web, send email and download/install apps. The scenario, we agreed, was a nightmare.

Fast forward, and the problem is no longer a discussion point for passionate technologists; it’s a business issue for companies across the ecosystems banking on us all to use our phones to do more.

Yes, people need assistance to understand and configure their devices. The MDA recognizes this, which is why it has launched an educational web site for precisely this purpose. However, people also need fast track training to get on the mobile Internet and the industry is under pressure to have to come up with some solutions – sooner than later.

PEOPLE ARE BAFFLED

Indeed, a raft of studies shows that we are baffled by our new phones and features. One that stands out comes from independent research firm Coleman Parkes, which asked 4,000 people in the U.K. and U.S. about their pet mobile peeves. (The study was commissioned by Mformation, a provider of mobile device management (MDM) technology. But vendor spin aside it sheds some important light on this real problem.)

Among the key data points, the survey found that a whopping 85 percent of people said they were frustrated by the difficulty of getting a new phone up and working. Additionally, 95 percent said they would try more new services if phones were easier to set up and 61 percent said they stopped using an application if they could not get it working straight away.

So, we know people would like to do tasks as browsing the Web, reading email or sending picture messages, but the complexity of mobile phones (really handheld-computers at this point) is too much for them.

TOP TEN HEADACHES

During the MIDAS event that impressed me with the scope of this problem, I met with Wouter Deelman, CEO of Qelp, who blew me away with his presentation and an eye-opening list of the Top 10 device management challenges. (By way of background, Qelp is a Dutch software-as-a-service company sharply focused on solutions that increase revenues and reduce customer support costs.)

Wouter co-presented with Blyk, a Qelp customer and ad-funded MVNO model (this was before Blyk shifted its focus to becoming a media company). Blyk revealed that it had achieved a 60 percent success rate getting users to accept Over-the-air (OTA) settings (critical since much of Blyk’s ad-funded model was built on users’ ability to receive and respond to MMS mobile advertising messages). In effect, Blyk admitted a 40-percent failure rate – a problem Blyk said it solved by working with Qelp.

Indeed, OTA settings top Wouter’s list of Top 10 device management headaches.

1. Over-the-air (OTA) settings require user acceptance.

2. Some devices do not support OTA and require manual configuration.

3. New handsets are coming to the market through different channels (not just via mobile    operators), so the problem and the responsibility to solve it is fragmented.

4. Remote access to a device requires access to the mobile Internet (which is what most users are trying to set up in the first place).

5. Users are confused when settings arrive, and often don’t know what they are for or where to store them on the device.

6. Each handset has a different UI (user interface).

7. Call center support is an option – but costly for the operators and frustrating for the users.

8. Second-hand devices are preconfigured incorrectly.

9. Network operator settings get preference over MVNO settings.

10. New IMEI ranges and handsets not yet recognized by the operators systems.

It may seem that Apple’s iPhone and the slew of new touch screen interface devices/ smartphones solve this problem (because they come preconfigured by the iPhone exclusive channel on the market and most available services are displayed via icons on the screen and not buried in a sub-menu).

But the range of new devices and multitude of UIs only exacerbate the problems. And let’s not forget the many people unlocking their

iPhones because they want to have the devices and the operators they want (!) and therefore need to configure the device themselves, manually.

NEED HELP? GOOGLE IT

Can the device management issue impede the growth of mobile Internet usage? The jury is out on this one – but it’s common sense that we would use it a lot more if we could. (We cannot use what we cannot use.)

Ironically, the mobile operator – the player you would expect would want to educate us to use mobile data (and generate additional data revenues in the process) – appears to have missed the plot – and the opportunity.

In a recent must-read guest post for VisionMobile, Wouter road tested six U.K. mobile operator websites to look for support and set up email on a Nokia N96. The result: a mix of irrelevant results and no results at all. Wouter’s conclusion: for an end-user seeking help to get a service up and running on their mobile phone, the answer is not just a few clicks away.”

Wouter then looked for the same information using Google. The answers are marginally better – but the search results do include sites such as Know Your Mobile, that do the job just fine.

Understanding that Google is destined to play an increasing role in customer care (becoming the first place people look for help to configure their phones) KPN (also a Qelp customer) has applied search engine optimization techniques to ensure it’s website (and brand) at least show up in the top Google search results. (Daily statistics now show that 50 percent of KPN’s subscribers go to Google first for answers.)

The takeaway: The MDA has literally done us a service in the U.K., but there is a lot more work to be done. The advance of the mobile Internet has encouraged us to check out the wealth of apps and content available. However, many of us need help setting up our phones before we can explore this brave new world. Providers have a choice: improve customer education and support, or deal with customer frustration (and lost revenues) when people quite literally turn off.

Why did I include a section on Blyk in my white paper?

Because the company has had phenomenal success with SMS/MMS campaigns, reporting an average 25 percent response rate to campaigns that harness the messaging technology to enable a conversation with users. No doubt this success is linked to Blyk’s bleeding-edge approach to mobile advertising (no spam – no way) and customer profiling (drilling down to deliver the right ad to the right person). However, in my white paper I also argue Blyk stands as an example of what a well-executed mobile advertising campaign can achieve – and one that mobile advertising newbies should note.

The bottom line: Strategy matters. If we accept advertising is content, then it’s clear advertisers/publishers can get a long way if they use existing technologies (SMS/MMS) and focus energy on crafting creative (and engaging) messages. As my dearest and most disruptive colleague Jonathan MacDonald points out: Advertising is in need of a re-think. It’s not about selling hard; it’s about listening harder to what consumers want. Jonathan (ex-Blyk) has obviously left his mark because Blyk excels in delivering advertising as content in a two-way conversation with customers. (For more background on Blyk, please check out this earlier analysis on MSG.)

Against this backdrop, it’s excellent timing to continue with part two of the audio interview marking Blyk’s first anniversary, which I conducted during a recent analyst briefing with Leif Fågelstedt, Blyk COO.

A message that comes through loud and clear: Blyk is not about warm-and-fuzzy business models. It is a serious and successful company that systematically collects and wields analytics (customer data and feedback) to drive high performance. Mobile advertising is just one area where Blyk’s approach pays off. In fact, Leif and I mused that the real money may be in Blyk’s ability to reality-check brands’ preconceived notions about what youth thinks, likes/dislikes, and will likely recommend to their friends.

Listen to the podcast here.

Before I deep dive into Leif’s views and my take, allow me to direct your attention to a recent research note from my esteemed colleague, Marek Pawlowski. (His thought-provoking analysis of mobile usability and user experience issues sets the bar, and his events attract some of the brightest minds in the business.)

We attended the same briefing, and have come to some similar conclusions. While I hint in my earlier post that Blyk should be considered as something other than an MVNO, Marek goes straight to the heart of the matter. He asks: Is it still appropriate to call Blyk an MVNO when the company’s real focus is on being a leading youth media?

While you’re making up your mind, some key figures tell us Blyk has long achieved this status. Some 100 brands have run some 1,000 campaigns on Blyk, reporting an average response rate of 25 percent. The response rate to some campaigns is much higher.

Seeing is believing (and also understanding why the campaigns struck such a chord with youth), so I asked Blyk to create a space where you can check them out for yourself. My personal thanks to Dan French and his colleagues who made this great graphic and the revolving carousel of mobile advertising case studies. Enjoy!

KEY STATS: ARPU isn’t relevant to Blyk and neither is CPM. The performance measurement that matters is Cost Per Response (CPR), which Leif says is “around 50p [pence] for Blyk. If you compare that with other media channels which our advertisers are looking at…[our] Cost Per Response is industry-leading.” Leif notes that other advertising channels cost much more if you want the same impact. The range is GBP1.50 (a figure he mentions in the podcast) to GBP2.20 (a figure Blyk presented during the analyst briefing). The point is: Blyk measures engagement (response), which is what counts on a personal device like mobile.

ADVERTSING MIX: Blyk sells each advertising SMS for GBP0.07 and each MMS for GBP0.22. “So the cost is 7 [pence] to send out the SMS and then 7 [pence] for every individual that is replying to your message.” The power of that two-way conversation is what allows Blyk to measure performance in CPR rather than CPM, a term “irrelevant to what Blyk is practicing.” Blyk assumed the lion’s share of pitches would be push-campaigns, but that has changed. “Probably 95 percent of everything we are doing right now is a combination of SMS and MMS, and [that] it can be linked to different websites….There are a lot of advertisers that have spent a lot of money creating their web portals and everything for mobile, and they want to drive traffic there.”

ROADMAP: Blyk is purposely targeting the countries where brands already spend the most to get their message across: Germany, Spain, Belgium, and The Netherlands. But prepare for some surprises from Blyk. “The first aim is to become the biggest youth media in Europe, and that is what we have communicated and that’s [what] we deliver. We are also looking to other kinds of opportunities outside Europe as well, but that’s not something I can reveal today.”

FREE SELLS: Blyk is ad-funded (hence, free to users). But it’s not an easy act to follow. Rivals would have to make significant investments in analytics tools and target the right growth markets. “We have invested a lot of money in profiling, ad engines, [as well as ways] to do booking and planning [of ads], and so on.” Leif also reports Blyk has “more partners than competitors right now in the marketplace.”

***

Shortly after this interview, Andrew Grill, MSG friend and frequent contributor, posted on a new ad-funded model called Tomato Plus from Croatian mobile operator Vip, a me-too Blyk model he strongly suggests we monitor moving forward. (You can check out the full post at London Calling here.)

By way of background, the brains behind this ad-funded model is global mobile advertising company Out There Media. The company has launched Mobucks, which it describes as a cross operator, cross advertiser marketplace, matching demand and supply for advertising over mobile phones. Mobucks effectively enables the creation of ad-funded tariffs for MNOs and MVNOs.

From the press release: “This mobile advertising marketplace enables consumers to sign-up, share their data, and receive targeted mobile SMS and MMS campaigns – which is exchanged for free airtime.” Out There Media reports response rates of “up to 75 percent.” Matthias Grundböeck, Vip Residential Marketing Director, is upbeat about his decision to launch an ad-funded sub-brand. “Mobucks AdFund by Out There Media gives us the opportunity to offer genuinely interesting, relevant and useful information to our customer base,” he said in a press statement.

I sent an email to Out There Media requesting a more in-depth briefing to answer key questions: What are the nuts and bolts of Mobucks and who is involved to date? How is customer data collected and what visibility does it provide into user preferences? How many ads, in what form (SMS/MMS) and from which brands? And the list goes on.

In the meantime, you may want to check out this related discussion at MobHappy.

My take: Blyk is a tough act to follow because it understands the business and the pivotal importance of customer analytics. Does the advance of similar models represent competition? Not in the markets that top the Blyk agenda. There, Blyk can protect its turf. However, the advance of ad-funded models such as Tomato Plus sends a clear message to mobile operators that they must choose their course.

To borrow from my esteemed colleague Chetan Sharma and his must-read mobile advertising book, Mobile Advertising: Supercharge Your Brand in the Exploding Wireless Market: Mobile operators must decide soon whether they wish to be access companies (pipes) or audience companies (media companies). If the goal is the latter, then they would do well to borrow a page from Blyk (and others) and focus on enabling an engaging advertising conversation with consumers (thereby gaining users’ trust and access to some key customer data) before other companies (search companies, social networks, media brands etc…) beat them to it.